24-Hour Crisis Hotline: (877)SAFEGBC or (877)723-3422 Mental Health & Substance Abuse Issues

6502 Nursery Drive, Suite 100
Victoria, TX 77904
(361)575-0611
(800)421-8825

Diabetes
Resources
Basic InformationLatest News
Mapping IDs Geographic Access Barriers for Diabetic RetinopathyNormal Meal Tolerance Test Is Practical, Reliable in T2DMNo Link to Cognition in Diabetes Prevention Program StudySuicide by Insulin?Promising Start for National Diabetes Prevention ProgramDiabetes Drug Gets FDA Warning Due to Amputation RiskAngela Bassett Puts the Spotlight on Heart HealthAs Temps Rise, Risk of Pregnancy Complication May TooPharmacist-Involved Collaborative Care Benefits T2DMNever Breastfeeding Linked to Increased Risk of T1DMBioengineered Intraabdominal Endocrine Pancreas FeasibleBiomarker ID'd for Pregnancy-Induced Glucose IntoleranceTransplant of Insulin-Producing Cells Offers Hope Against Type 1 DiabetesVitamin D Doesn't Impact Insulin Sensitivity, Secretion in T2DMPCSK9 Linked to New-Onset Diabetes After Renal TransplantLinear Association for Weight Loss, HbA1c Reduction in T2DMHealth Tip: Make Food More FlavorfulAntioxidant Resveratrol May Help Reduce Arteriosclerosis in T2DMHealth Tip: Create a Sick-Day Plan for DiabetesRed Wine Antioxidant Might Help Diabetics' ArteriesCardiometabolic Disease Staging Score Quantifies Diabetes RiskIntense Interval Training Cuts Hypoglycemia Awareness in T1DMDecreased Cortical Thickness Seen in Type 2 DiabetesAlgorithm Integrated Into App Forecasts Glucose LevelsThree Anti-VEGF Treatments Effective for Diabetic RetinopathyType 2 Diabetes May Be Bad for Brain HealthHealth Tip: Coping With the 'Dawn Phenomenon'Plasma Uric Acid Lowering Tied to Drop in Systolic BP in T1DMHealth Tip: Continuous Glucose Monitoring DevicesT2DM Risk Cut by Variant in Sulfonylurea Receptor EncoderObesity Quadruples Kids' Type 2 Diabetes Risk: StudyDoctors Encouraged to Assess Driving Risks for T1DM PatientsEarly Glycemic Control With Metformin Cuts CVD EventsWhen Is It Safe to Drive With Type 1 Diabetes?Nurse-Led Intervention Helps With Diabetes ControlIs Annual Eye Exam a Must for People With Type 1 Diabetes?RUNX1 May Play Role in Proliferative Diabetic RetinopathyFast-Acting Insulin Aspart Ups Glycemic Control in T1DMDiabetes Continues to Be a Significant Public Health BurdenContinuous Glucose Monitoring Improves Quality of Life in T1DMDiabetes Continues Its Relentless RiseContinuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Bests Injections in T2DMPrevalence of Metformin Use 0.7 Percent in PrediabetesENDO: Distinct Urine Metabolite Profile in Obese Youth With T2DMRace Plays Role in Heart, Diabetes Risk, Even at Normal WeightPredictive Low-Glucose Mgmt Cuts Hypoglycemic Events in T1DTeleretinal Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Ups Screening RatesDAPT Cessation Patterns Vary With Diabetes Status After PCIIncreased Use of Newer Meds for Diabetic Nephropathy in the U.S.What Drugs Work Best for Diabetic Nerve Pain?
Links
Related Topics

Medical Disorders

Teleretinal Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Ups Screening Rates


HealthDay News
Updated: Mar 29th 2017

new article illustration

WEDNESDAY, March 29, 2017 (HealthDay News) -- A primary-care-based teleretinal diabetic retinopathy screening (TDRS) program can reduce wait times for DR screening and increase overall screening rates, according to a study published online March 27 in JAMA Internal Medicine.

Lauren P. Daskivich, M.D., from the Department of Health Services in Los Angeles County, and colleagues conducted a pretest-posttest evaluation of exposure to primary-care-based TDRS at five of 15 safety net clinics. They examined annual rates of DR screening before and after implementation of the TDRS program as well as time to screening.

The researchers found that for the 21,222 patients who underwent screening, the median time to DR screening decreased significantly from 158 days before the intervention to 17 days after implementation of the program. There was an increase in overall annual screening rates for DR, from 40.6 percent of 14,633 patients before implementation to 56.9 percent of 13,133 patients after implementation (odds ratio, 1.9) at all 15 targeted clinics. Overall, 68.8, 19.6, and 11.6 percent of those screened did not require referral to an eye care professional, were referred for DR treatment or monitoring, and were referred for other ophthalmologic conditions, respectively.

"Teleretinal DR screening programs have the potential to maximize access and efficiency in the safety net, where the need for such programs is most critical," the authors write.

Abstract/Full Text
Editorial