24-Hour Crisis Hotline: (877)SAFEGBC or (877)723-3422 Mental Health & Substance Abuse Issues

6502 Nursery Drive, Suite 100
Victoria, TX 77904
(361)575-0611
(800)421-8825
Fax: (361)578-5500

Nutrition
Resources
Basic InformationLatest News
AHA News: Is This Nature's Healthier Meat Replacement?AHA News: If You Think Before You Snack, It's Not So BadCooking Up a Storm During Coronavirus Crisis? Store Leftovers SafelyU.S. Kids, Teens Eating Better But Nutrition Gaps PersistTurning to Tofu Might Help the Heart: StudyEating Fish in Moderation During Pregnancy Benefits Fetus: StudyDon't Abandon Healthy Eating During Coronavirus PandemicFor Heart Health, Not All Plant-Based Diets Are Equal: StudyTrying the Keto Diet? Watch Out for the 'Keto Flu'How to Understand New Food LabelsWill a Jolt of Java Get Your Creative Juices Flowing?Post-Game Snacks May Undo Calorie-Burning Benefit of Kids' SportsOlive Oil Could Help Lower Your Heart Disease RiskMore Evidence That Ditching Red Meat Is Good for Your HeartUnscrambling the Egg Data: One a Day Looks OKAHA News: How Millennials' Notions on Food Are Changing the Entire SystemWant Your Kids to Eat Veggies? Both Parents Must Set ExampleBig Breakfast May Be the Most Slimming Meal of the DaySugary Sodas Wreak Havoc With Cholesterol Levels, Harming the HeartChicago's Short-Lived 'Soda Tax' Cut Consumption, Boosted Health Care FundsMealtime Choices Could Affect Your Odds for StrokeAHA News: This Meaty Jambalaya Takes the Fat Out of Fat TuesdayMany Americans Lack Knowledge, Not Desire, to Eat Plant-Based DietsHealthy 'Mediterranean Diet' Is Good for Your MicrobiomeConsumers Waste Twice as Much Food as Experts ThoughtHow Does Social Media Shape Your Food Choices?Why Some High-Fiber Diets Cause Gas -- And What to Do About ItMeat Still Isn't Healthy, Study ConfirmsOne Egg Per Day Is Heart-Healthy, After AllAHA News: A Sweet Super Bowl Treat That Won't Sack Your HealthWant Fewer UTIs? Go Vegetarian, Study SuggestsDiets Rich in Fruits, Veggies Could Lower Your Odds for Alzheimer'sAHA News: Processed vs. Ultra-Processed Food, and Why It Matters to Your HealthEating Out: A Recipe for Poor Nutrition, Study FindsAmericans Toss Out Nearly a Third of Food at HomeAHA News: These Doctors Want to Write 'Farmacy' PrescriptionsHealth Tip: What to Know About TurmericCan Online Reviews Help Health Inspectors Keep Tabs on Restaurants?Health Tip: Healthy Eating for VegetariansAHA News: Before Grabbing a Grapefruit, Understand Its PowerCould a Switch to Skim Milk Add Years to Your Life?E. Coli Outbreak Over, CDC Lifts Advisory Against Certain Romaine LettuceHealth Tip: Apple Cider Vinegar Fast FactsCould Your Morning Coffee Be a Weight-Loss Tool?Green Tea Drinkers May Live LongerProcessed Foods Are Making Americans ObeseCalories Per Serving or the Whole Package? Many Food Labels Now Tell BothA Breakfast Fit for Making Your New Year's ResolutionsToast a Healthy New Year With These Holiday Cocktail RecipesBetter Choices for a Fast, Healthy Lunch
Questions and AnswersLinks
Related Topics

Wellness and Personal Development

What If 'Exercise Needed to Burn Off Calories' Was Included on Food Labeling?

HealthDay News
by -- Robert Preidt
Updated: Dec 11th 2019

new article illustration

WEDNESDAY, Dec. 11, 2019 (HealthDay News) -- Would you change your grocery list if a food label said "Walk an hour to burn off the calories in this product"?

That's the idea behind a new push to include food labeling that describes the amount of exercise needed to burn off calories consumed, the researchers behind a new study said.

This labeling approach "is a simple strategy that could be easily included on food/beverage packaging by manufacturers, on shelving price labels in supermarkets, and/or in menus in restaurants/fast-food outlets," the study authors said in a journal news release.

For example, such labeling would show that a person would need to walk 42 minutes or run 22 minutes to burn off the 229 calories in a small bar of milk chocolate, said British researchers.

Analyzing data from 14 studies, the researchers found that people made healthier choices and ate less when confronted with exercise equivalents.

For example, people chose an average of 65 fewer calories per meal when physical activity calorie equivalent or expenditure (PACE) labeling was displayed on food, beverages and menus.

The labeling was also associated with consumption of 80 to 100 fewer calories compared with no labeling or other types of labeling, according to the findings.

The results suggest that this labeling could lead to people consuming about 200 fewer calories a day, based on an average consumption of three meals and two snacks a day, the authors explained.

The results were published online Dec. 10 in the Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

There were limitations, however. The researchers noted that they reviewed a small number of studies, the design of each study varied considerably, and most weren't conducted in real-life settings, such as restaurants and supermarkets.

Even so, exercise labeling "shows some promise in reducing the number of [calories] selected from menus, as well as the number of calories and the amount of food consumed," wrote Amanda Daley, a professor at Loughborough University School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, and colleagues.

Public health agencies may want to consider this as a strategy that contributes to the prevention and treatment of obesity and related diseases, the team concluded.

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention outlines how to improve your eating habits.